> As for the sexist part, reverse sexism is not a thing -- if the playing field is so imbalanced, then explicitly favoring the discriminated-against group is a fair measure to level the playing field.
You're conflating anti-discriminatory with reverse sexism.
Anti-discriminatory is passing a law that requires any company that gets tax breaks to meet some requirements of diversity.
reverse sexism is coming across a female owner who only hires women (I know of 1 such company).
You're conflating anti-discriminatory with reverse sexism.
Anti-discriminatory is passing a law that requires any company that gets tax breaks to meet some requirements of diversity.
reverse sexism is coming across a female owner who only hires women (I know of 1 such company).