Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
drewcrawford
on April 17, 2014
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Lavabit appeal confirms original ruling [pdf]
Let's stipulate for the purposes of this thread that he broke the law, was a jerk, and did a morally wrong thing.
None of that is justification to violate the privacy of innocent third parties.
tptacek
on April 17, 2014
[–]
You have no evidence that any such violation occurred, and neither do I.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
None of that is justification to violate the privacy of innocent third parties.