>You have WAY MORE examples of States leading wars than corporations. Even in recent history. Proves my point.

Not really. It proves it only against a bizarro argument that nobody made, that coporations lead wars directly.

Of course states lead wars. Corporations don't have armies and state like powers except in very few historical situations (namely, in the colonial era, like the East-India company example).

It's not about who "leads the war" or "who fights in it". That's not what we mean when we say corporations create wars.

What we mean is that corporate interests (often of more than one corporation), exert power at states to further their interests, including by war, but also by other kinds of malice (dictatorship, lackeys in government, favorable laws, igniting civil tension, etc).

Yes, and historically, governments more often have military power than corporations. So it's not surprising they use it more often.

The fact that governments are more able to wage wars does not prove anything about what kind of entity is more likely to start one given that ability.

I guess you never heard about WW1 and WW2 then. Surely this was the corporationgs pushing for Germany to invade France and the rest of Europe, and surely this has nothing to do with political ideologies. This was all the evil corporations at work.

You live in the Matrix or something?