Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Since when can CAs determine bad intent?

Besides, there are enough legitimate uses for webcam viewing software that you could just take a regular signed program and configure it in a deceptive manner. Modern web-browsers allow camera access without additional software, for example.

I'm all for software being signed as a matter of routine but this is not something that it would help.



They cannot, but they can revoke certificates from malware developers after the fact. And requiring a developer program would vastly reduce the number teenagers tricking people into installing a thing. Allowing self-signed roots would let more technical users manage their own security and install their own apps.

A solution to configuration files is to include them in what is signed or not allow your software to have the webcam on without also showing a window explaining what is happening and a button to turn it off. Modern web browsers typically ask for permission to use the webcam beforehand, and you can always close that page.

I guess there would still be shenanigans with signed binaries but there would be far fewer than what is going on here.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: