Ok, to explain in the least charged way as possible.
First, I will tell there are "groups", mind you, I only mean a collective of individuals and organisations, that many times are fighting amont themselves, also individually they may have different aims and purposes, but the "group" thing simplify the things.
Second, the subject is very ancient, so I will try to talk only about the last 100 years, because otherwise it will become a too complex thing to write about in a short post.
Also, I will not name the groups, because whatever name I use for each of them, have different meanings and charges to each person, resulting in a flamewar (and the reason people think I am crazy).
I will list the groups in order of theoretical and legal (not necessarily de facto) power.
Group A: This group is in power in several states, run some huge international organisations, and wants more power centralisation, individuals within it want more power to themselves.
The Group A is very much against cryptography technology leaking (the weapons of choice of Group E), Group A also tend to help Group C if they think it will be a blow to Group B or E, otherwise they currently use Group C as scapegoat and target to fool their subjects in giving them more power.
Group B is very much alike Group A, but with fundamentally different economic beliefs, Group B realised it cannot beat Group A directly, so they right now work by mostly promoting ideologies and morals that will undermine Group A centralisation of power and capacity to react, Group B also don't like Group E, and don't like crypto on Group E hands, but sometimes they might allow Group E to get that tech if it means improving their own to use against Group A.
Group C currently is like Group A and B, but based on religion, also Group C recently took over 4 countries, with great help of Group E and Group A, much to the regret of Group E that only now realised it was against their interests to this happen.
Group D only want to be left alone, but are frequently caught in the crossfire.
Group E are the opposite of Group A, they want more freedom, more decentralisation, and of course, more power to themselves too, but not in a hierarchy, and more splintered. Group E loves cryptography, and the reason OP is being hunted, is because he is helping Group E (on purpose or not).
The only one i think i can't figure out is Group D.
Also, if my guesses are right, the economic beliefs of Group B are not so different from Group A anymore.
Group A, and B, have names, that they used themselves, but those names are too charged for me to use, people will misunderstand things, and think I am talking about something else.
Group C probably has a name, but I don't know it.
All Groups, maybe with exception of B, are not much cohesive and are easier to say who belong in them.
So, I will say some organizations that BELONG to some groups (they are NOT the groups, they are PART of them, a small part by the way).
Group A: Has on it the UN, and several countries. Also has on it some esoteric organizations and religions.
Most people don't notice, but Thelemites (followers of Thelema) frequently align with Group A, so if you want some extra information, read about that.
Group B has on it the followers of Gramsci, Frankfurt School, several atheist evangelists, and part of their strategy was very much well explained by a guy named Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, see if you find his interview.
Group C has on it Muslim Brotherhood, and Al Quaeda, "Al Quaeda" means "The Foundation", and Osama Bin Laden has read the foundation series by Isaac Asimov, so if you want to know what Group C is doing, read those books, and think about how you would apply them to present age...
Group D has people like the guy above that claimed to be part of F, also has countries that don't want to be dragged in all the A, B, C craziness, like some african countries, some asiatic countries, and so on.
Group E has among them the OP, Julian Assange, Punks (the ones from 70s), Cyberpunks, Cipherpunks, Anonymous, Libertarians, Far right groups, non-aligned christians (those that follow the bible and reject mainstream churches), a small amount of catholics, secularist arabs, conspiracy theorists, nutjobs, normal people that dislike their constitution torn apart, federalists, Catalan/Scotch/Chechen/Kurd/Touareg/Xeer/Somalilandi/Gaucho/etc... independence/autonomy movements, Occupy X/Y/Z, Indignados, Golden Dawn Party, the norwegian serial killer, lots of other random people.
Groups that I don't know their alignment: Shia countries (Syria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon), seemly those are related to D, several people in E are helping them (and A and C are attacking them).
For those wondering where is Israel, Zionists and Roman Catholic Church. I will leave those out on purpose.
After watching a few Bezmenov videos, i wonder if your Group B is still trying to subvert the west?
My believe was that the KGB had degenerated into some sort of mafia and russia was now playing the capitalist game (by their own rules of course). But then again i don't know much about those things.
"First, I will tell there are "groups", mind you, I only mean a collective of individuals and organisations, that many times are fighting amont themselves, also individually they may have different aims and purposes, but the "group" thing simplify the things."
naming the groups by their most conventional names, you gone so far as to create the dynamics of these groups, why forgo naming them? not really understanding the cloak and dagger element
Probably because the name for the groups is something like "Illuminati." It's possible he could just be talking about A and B being capitalists and communists though.
exactly, just want to know if he is making an insightful geo-political theory on interactions between groups, or if it is hagbard celine and the yellow submarine.
I'd like to point out that we like cake and tea, and amuse ourselves with getting on with stuff, while groups A-E do their best to screw it up. If A-E could just naff off and let the rest of get on with it, we'd be in a much better place.
You're covered as a part of Group D, the most dangerous group: content with at best an "enlightened hedonism" (work diligently, but only so that you could afford that 60" TV), while groups A-C strip away your liberty and safety.
First, you will understand lots of things easier if you read at least the first book of the Isaac Asimov "Foundation" series.
Then, I've been researching this for a looooong time.
Also you will waddle through lots of crazy stuff, trying to find the gems.
I only started to find out, what information matters, and what don't, what is real and what is just nutjob ideas, after I met some particular people in real life.
Also there are deep religious issues on this, and some fringe stuff (for example: the ex-wife and some more people related to a known member of Group A claimed that he rose to power in his country using black magic).
But a good start, is research about what is Thelema (and its followers), who is Antonio Gramsci, what is Frankfurt School, what is Muslim Brotherhood, the islamic plans for gold standard, Colonel Gadaffi push for gold standard, Punks, Cyberpunks and Cypherpunks, Saddam Hussein push for oil be sold for Euro (instead of USD), Sunni vs Shia wars, pro-Assad christians.
These are the stuff I remember where real facts are easier to find.
Other things that I would mention here are too bizarre and hard to understand, and filled with misinformation.
Also if you decide to research this stuff, caution to who you talk, you might get dragged into the thing (and let me tell you, it is not pretty, I had two serious close calls recently).
Of course, like the OP, you might get dragged into it anyway.
It may sound cliche, but fiddling with that stuff, that I learned how serious the phrase "And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you" is dead serious.
I cannot say much, in fact I wrote a post that now I just deleted and will make a even shorter version with less information.
But let's say that I had a online friend, that I decided to help, and found out that this friend was a unwilling weapon of "Group A" that escaped, and was being searched for, and I got tangled into very hair raising stuff (including death threats toward me).
And I learned lots of stuff, that I wish I had not learned, the sort of stuff that make people say that "Ignorance is Bliss", but now that I learned, I must act upon it, there not much else to be done.
It was a hell of a adventure. The most scary shit I ever faced in my life, and made me get much more mature and responsible.
Also I almost lost my family in the process (they were very much against some actions that I did and became incredibly upset).
Happily they later understood everything that I did and now we are happy again.
But yes, there are a reason that crypto people get hunted in general ( not only wikileaks) and there are even a ground war going on in other fronts.