Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>It takes only 3 seconds to lift the weight which powers GravityLight, creating 30 minutes of light on its descent.

Why does every crackpot "revolutionary" energy gizmo make this same kind of nonsense claim? "Minute" is not a unit of energy, luminous intensity, or any other measure that is actually useful in evaluating the practicality of this.



Whether or not the device works - this usage of minute is also apparently unit of radio power or backlight luminosity, if cell phone makers and reviewers are to be believed. Declaring crack-pot status based on that usage is kind of over-the-top, unless you're here to argue that cellphones don't exist and are mere crack-pot theories as well.


If you take careful note of my wording, I said that every crackpot makes this sort of claim, not that only crackpots make this sort of claim.

The reason I know this is crackpottery is that, as others have pointed out, the physics just doesn't add up. Assuming perfect efficiency, you'd be looking at somewhere on the order of 1% of the light output from a standard 40 watt light bulb.


See the numbers below. It's about the equivalent of a 2 W incandescent bulb, or 5% of a 40 W bulb; but more importantly, it's comparable to a kerosene lamp, which is what it's supposed to replace. So I don't think a "crackpot" charge is warranted.


It is warranted because the physics doesn't work out


Um, did you look at the numbers? The physics does work out, at least to a rough order of magnitude. That may not be enough to make it a practical success, but it's enough to make "crackpot" unwarranted.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: