Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Many people praise KDE. But to me, KDE is extremely ugly.

Admittedly, I use Gnome. I have few requirements for a DE and most existing DEs meet my need[1]. Many in the Linux community hate Gnome (not sure what the short comings are). I use it mainly because it is the default in most cases.

But KDE is extremely ugly out of the box: the panel at the bottom. The window frames, the mouse pointer, the menues. It takes some work to make it reasonable.

What are the features that people actually use on KDE that are missing on Gnome (or require some work to get on Gnome)? I mostly see only the argument that KDE is "extremely customizable" compared to Gnome. I agree, but what is the actual customization that one does that make the difference, which are more work to achieve (or impossible) on Gnome? I am genuinely asking: I can live with ugly DE if I am missing something I don't know.

[1] my needs: ability to switch windows, ability to press super key to search for an app, ability to display time.





> Many people praise KDE. But to me, KDE is extremely ugly. > > Admittedly, I use Gnome.

Same. To each their own, but I also prefer the aesthetics of the GNOME and GTK ecosystem. Though I use Sway as a WM the past few years, I always opt for GNOME and GTK apps when there are options. I've been using Linux since about 2000.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: