It's like you buy Visual Studio and don't believe anyone who tells you that it's complex software with a lot of hidden features and settings that you need to explore in order to use it to its full potential.
I feel it's not worth the effort to spend time and learn the hidden features. whenever I use it to plug something new into a existing codebase it either gives something good at first shot or repeat the non working solution again and again. after such session I only get a feeling instead of spending the last 15 minutes on prompting this, I should have learnt these stuff and this learning would be useful for me forever.
I use LLMs as a better form of search engines and that's a useful product.
> I feel it's not worth the effort to spend time and learn the hidden features.
And that's the only issue here. Many programmers feel offended by an AI threatening their livelihood, and are too arrogant to invest some time in a tool they do deem below themselves—then proceed to complain how useless the tool is on the internet.
I'd really suggest taking antirez' advice at heart, and invest time in actually learning how to work with AI properly. Just because Claude Code has a text prompt like ChatGPT doesn't mean you know how to work with it yet. It is going to pay off.
> I should have learnt these stuff and this learning would be useful for me forever.
Oh, if only software worked like that.
Even a decade ago, one could reasonably say that half of what we proudly add to our CVs becomes obsolete every 18 months, it's just hard to predict which half.
It's like you buy Visual Studio and don't believe anyone who tells you that it's complex software with a lot of hidden features and settings that you need to explore in order to use it to its full potential.