I agree. Death is always an option, and sometimes it's the best (equivalently "least bad") one. Despite the title, the article actually argues from the point of view that death is never an option. This is a harmful black-and-white view. If you assign effectively infinite disutility to death then you can no longer say, for instance, that a painful death is worse than a painless one. Surely we can all agree that this is the wrong way to go about decision-making.