This is such a techno-centric view, you're not even remotely aware of your own biases.
> but he completely misses the only real threat to either Open AI or Anthro.
Hard disagree. Economics matter, in fact more than tech.
Tech only gets to shine if the economics work out.
> Then again, open AI is obviously ran by some of the smartest people on planet Earth, with other extremely smart people giving them tons of money, so I can be completely wrong here
Nope.
Money != Intelligence
Open AI, SF and the West-Coast VC scene is run by very opionated, incentiviced people.
Yes, money can make things move, but all the money of the world don't matter if your unit econonmics don't work out.
And the startup graveyard is full of examples of this kind.
> but he completely misses the only real threat to either Open AI or Anthro.
Hard disagree. Economics matter, in fact more than tech.
Tech only gets to shine if the economics work out.
> Then again, open AI is obviously ran by some of the smartest people on planet Earth, with other extremely smart people giving them tons of money, so I can be completely wrong here
Nope.
Money != Intelligence
Open AI, SF and the West-Coast VC scene is run by very opionated, incentiviced people.
Yes, money can make things move, but all the money of the world don't matter if your unit econonmics don't work out.
And the startup graveyard is full of examples of this kind.