Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]



Hardly.

Is Apple a doomed company because they are chronically late to ~everything bleeding edge?


Apple products are leading edge. Imagine if they waited until Samsung makes the perfect phone , then copy it.

We re talking about european tech businesses being left behind, locked in a basement.


So you have a positive opinion when Apple does things after others, but Europe having a slower, cautious approach is treated as negative for you?

What is your preference for Europe, complete floodgates open and never ending lawsuits over IP theft like we have in the USA currently over AI?

The US is not the example of what’s working, it’s merely a demonstration of what is possible when you have limited, provoked regulation.


I said apple does not do that. Apple invented the smartphone before samsung or anyone.

There is no such thing as "slow" in business. If you re slow you go out of business, you re no longer a business.

There is only one AI race. There is no second round. If you stay out of the race, you will be forever indebted to the AI winner, in the same way that we are entirely dependent on US internet technology currently (and this very forum)


I feel fundamentally we are two different people with very different views on this, not sure we are going to agree on anything here to be honest.


*glances at AI, VR, mini phones, smart cars, multi-wireless charging, home automation, voice assistants, streaming services, set-top boxes, digital backup software, broadband routers, server hardware, server software and 12" laptops in rapid succession*

Maybe(!?!)


Could you name which specific regulations that are applying to all EEA members those would be and why/how they also apply to Switzerland?


I think Switzerland is applying legal rules of Europe to maintain trading access and stay up to European standards.


Correct me, but I don't think such alignment between Switzerland and the rest of the EEA on LLM/"AI" technology does currently exist (though there may and likely will be some in the future) and it cannot explain the inevitable EEA wide release that is going to follow in a few weeks, as always. The "EU/EEA/European regulations prevent company from offering software product here" shouts have always been loud, no matter how often we see it turn out to have been merely a delayed launch with no regulatory reasoning.

If this had been specific to countries that have adopted the "AI Act", I'd be more than willing to accept that this delay could be due them needing to ensure full compliance, but just like in the past when OpenAI delayed a launch across EU member states and the UK, this is unlikely. My personal, though 100% unsourced thesis, remains, that this staggered rollout is rooted in them wanting to manage the compute capacity they have. Taking both the Americas and all of Europe on at once may not be ideal.


Might be related to EFTA.


Damn! This is why I can’t see it! In in the UK…


/s ?


I would be happy to be left behind all these things. Unfortunately they will find it's way to EU anyway.


They’re used to it. Anyone who is serious about AI is deploying in America. Maybe China too.


Everyone keeps repeating the same currently fashionable opinions, nothing more. We are parrots..


When your colleagues are accelerating towards a cliff being left behind is a good thing.


By 2030 Europe will be known for croissants and colossal brains.


The European livestyle isn't god given and has to be paid for. It's a luxury and I'm still puzzled that people don't get that we can't afford it without an economy.


Europe runs 3% deficits and gets universal healthcare, tuition free universities, 25+ days paid vacation, working trains, and no GoFundMe for surgeries.

The U.S. runs 6–8% deficits and gets vibes, weapons, and insulin at $300 a vial. Who's on the unsustainable path and really overspending?

If the average interest rate on U.S. government debt rises to 14%, then 100% of all federal tax revenue (around $4.8 trillion/year) will be consumed just to pay interest on the $34 trillion national debt. As soon as the current Fed Chairman gets fired, practically a certainty by now, nobody will buy US bonds for less than 10 to 15% interest.


We'll only be able to afford our lifestyles by letting OpenAI's bots make spreadsheets that aren't accurate or useful outside of tricking people into thinking you did your job?


If predictions of AI optimists come true, it's going to be an economic nuclear bomb. If not, economic effects of AI will not necessarily be that important


And ASML, Novo Nordisk, Airbus, ...


Well, at least they will still be around by 2030.


Well, when all the US is going to be turbo-fascist and controlled by facial recognition and AI reading all your email and text messages to know what you're thinking of the Great Leader Trump, we'll be happy to have those regulations in Europe


It's not the Manhattan Project. I'm flagging your comment because it is insubstantial flamebait. We don't even know how valuable this tech is, you're jumping to conclusions.

(I am American, convince me my digression is wrong)


It's not your own personal 'censor this opinion I don't like' button.


No AI, No AC, no energymaxxing, no rule of law. Just a bunch of unelected people fleecing the population dry.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: