Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

(Note; I also work for OpenAI Security — though I’ve not worked on our bounty program for some time. These just my thoughts and experiences.)

I believe the author was referring to the standard BugCrowd terms, which as far as I know are themselves fairly common across the various platforms. In my experience we are happy for researchers to publish their work within the normal guidelines you’d expect from a bounty program — it’s something I’ve worked with researchers on without incident.



100%. We want to ensure we can fix real security issues responsibly before details are published. In practice, if a researcher asks to disclose after we've addressed the issue, we're happy for them to publish.


In practice, it sounds like you guys didn't accept this dude's valid vuln because he didn't register and sign his life away.


They just stated it was all just model hallucination, and was not in fact a valid vuln.


shrugs If you're convinced, I'm convinced!


I'm convinced.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: