Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You don't solve the problem of being able to rely on the agent to call the MCP.

Hooks into the agent's execution lifecycle seem more reliable for deterministic behavior and supervision.



I agree. In any large backend software running on a server, it's the LLM invocation which would be a call out to an external system, and with proper validation around the results. At which point, calling an "MCP Server" is also just your backend software invoking one more library/service based on inspecting some part of the response from the LLM.

This doesn't take away from the utility of MCP when it comes Claude Desktop and the likes!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: