Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A Mac mini with an M4 Pro and 64GB of memory has the same bandwidth and costs £1,999, compared to £1,750 for the Framework Desktop when factoring in the minimum costs for storage, tiles, and necessary expansion cards.


True, but less RAM.


One thing to note on the more RAM: for the 128GB option, my understanding is that the GPU is limited to using only 96GB [1]. In contrast, on Macs, you can safely increase this to, for example, 116GB using `sysctl`.

[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amds-beastly...


On linux, the gpu can go up to 110 GB.


It can go higher actually, just that when I setup my test devices I had a "ought to be enough for everyone" moment when typing `options amdgpu gttsize=110000`. I guess this number spread too far, heh.

See also:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_address_remapping_tab...

[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.19/gpu/amdgpu.html#:~:tex...


Apologies, I stand corrected. Do you have a reference for this? I'm genuinely curious why the 96GB "limit" is so frequently cited - I assumed it must be a hardware limitation.


It's mentioned in LTT video: https://youtu.be/-lErGZZgUbY?t=126

(video also features Framework's founder/CEO)


That's a Windows limitation. On Linux it's 110GB.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: