> None of that is any proof at all that LLMs or computers in general can reason.
It was never meant to be a proof that LLMs or computers in general can reason [or rather, that they can reason generalistically]. Instead, it was a demonstration of how their argument looks when mapped to other situations, illustrating that it isn't really putting anything to the table in the ways of, proofs, evidences, definitions, or logic / arguments, nor does it enable others to do so.
> some humans are dumb, so LLMs are smart
That kind of reading loses the point just about completely, so it shouldn't be surprising you can't find an argument in there.
The point was and is that simply pointing at an AI model and saying "nah it's cappin" is awfully lacking, and is suspiciously similar to how certain people with certain mental conditions view their world. It is not insightful, nor reasonable. It's just an assertion of disbelief, following a - as you can hopefully agree - dubious logic that cannot be disproven or substantially argued against, as it was never designed to enable that in the first place.
It was never meant to be a proof that LLMs or computers in general can reason [or rather, that they can reason generalistically]. Instead, it was a demonstration of how their argument looks when mapped to other situations, illustrating that it isn't really putting anything to the table in the ways of, proofs, evidences, definitions, or logic / arguments, nor does it enable others to do so.
> some humans are dumb, so LLMs are smart
That kind of reading loses the point just about completely, so it shouldn't be surprising you can't find an argument in there.
The point was and is that simply pointing at an AI model and saying "nah it's cappin" is awfully lacking, and is suspiciously similar to how certain people with certain mental conditions view their world. It is not insightful, nor reasonable. It's just an assertion of disbelief, following a - as you can hopefully agree - dubious logic that cannot be disproven or substantially argued against, as it was never designed to enable that in the first place.