Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I did, multiple times with multiple countries. All of them had some sort of call rotation. Someone was always at the helm, _specially_ in infrastructure and security.

There are whole startups designed to solve this, like PagerDuty.

I am now very curious to understand where your question comes from. There must be some misunderstanding here. You never went on-call or seen a friend do it?



> You never went on-call or seen a friend do it?

Red herring [1].

OP said it’s malicious or incompetent to release this on a U.S. holiday weekend. You asked if similar consideration would be given to Brazil. Multiple people chimed in that it would. You’re now pivoting to on-call capacity.

Any amount of on-call capacity can be saturated. That’s why competent multinationals avoid releasing while markets they’re likely to impact are sleeping or drunk. This is a high-level scheduling operation, however, so it’s reasonable for those lower in the organisation to be unaware why an update is being pushed next Tuesday instead of this.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring


You can totally ignore the red herring and focus on the first part. In the end I was just paraphrasing the comment I replied to.

Rotations exist, specially in large organizations, or when there's shared responsibility.

Now we're talking nonsense about "you said, he said", this conversation makes no sense. I am much less invested in this than you think.


> Rotations exist

Straw man [1]. Nobody claimed otherwise.

Rotation or always-on isn’t a substitute for being aware of your customers. Good culture permeate this throughout the organisation. Competent ones have someone at the top ensuring controls are followed.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man


Sorry, I lost the track.

Can you explain the point you made precisely, in the context of the original subject?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: