So, the claim is that image recognition and ML (no, wait, broadened to AI?) is primarily used for targeting, surveillance, opinion manipulation, slop content, etc, and that AI has no credible benefit story, and is therefore nothing more than a weapon?
I disagree fundamentally with that, and don't see how we could reach a mutual understanding working from that axiom.
I disagree fundamentally with that, and don't see how we could reach a mutual understanding working from that axiom.