GPT summaries read like the kid who skims the chapter titles and tells you what the book is about rather than what it says.
Like, any cybercrime legislation risks “enabling mass surveillance, violating privacy rights, and creating avenues for state overreach without sufficient safeguards.” There is no actual content in that sentence, just containers. Any policy proposal that has the word “extradition” must contend with how it “may facilitate politically motivated prosecutions.”
> broad criminalization of cyber offenses, such as electronic forgery, could lead to the overreach of law enforcement
Like, any cybercrime legislation risks “enabling mass surveillance, violating privacy rights, and creating avenues for state overreach without sufficient safeguards.” There is no actual content in that sentence, just containers. Any policy proposal that has the word “extradition” must contend with how it “may facilitate politically motivated prosecutions.”
> broad criminalization of cyber offenses, such as electronic forgery, could lead to the overreach of law enforcement
This is literally any law!