8 (1). And I think that, in this context, those 8 plus the 22 US D-SIBs (2) means that there's 30.
FWIW, I _think_ I'm not just pedantically correcting a particular number. I think I'm asserting that keeping track of n organizations is roughly O(n^2), so it's not 4 times as much work to keep track of them all, but more like 56 times as much work. I think that's a real difference that requires a different approach.
I get that _you're_ not saying anything re: approach, just terminology. But I think the number matters to this subthread.
FWIW, I _think_ I'm not just pedantically correcting a particular number. I think I'm asserting that keeping track of n organizations is roughly O(n^2), so it's not 4 times as much work to keep track of them all, but more like 56 times as much work. I think that's a real difference that requires a different approach.
I get that _you're_ not saying anything re: approach, just terminology. But I think the number matters to this subthread.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_systemically_important... 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_systemically_important...