Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think that's really true, and if it is I don't think it's an advantage you'd actually want to use later in life. Based of my experience of hiring over the past 25 years (as someone hiring people, not as a candidate), my belief now is that your university degree is important for about a decade, has diminishing returns over the next few years, and then it's basically irrelevant. If you've got 15 years of relevant experience what degree you have and where it's from makes no difference to a good company.

The exception is somewhat antagonistic too - if you still believe it's important (e.g you come to an interview and talk about how great Cambridge is) that's a signal you're not going to be a good hire.

Obviously there are many caveats to this - I don't have an elite university degree, I'm not in the US, I've only ever hired developers, I've never worked in a business that needed people with elite university degrees, the number of people I've hired is a tiny sample of the industry, etc.

I suspect people who think elite degrees are important are mostly other people who have an elite degree, and often those people are the ones who make it into hiring manager positions or higher. In that case it kind of does matter, but only if you want to work in a company where an elite university degree counts for more than experience, and I'm pretty sure you don't.



VCs still care. VC pitch decks will make a point of highlighting the elite schools that early engineers/founders went to (MIT, Stanford, Ivys, Oxbridge, etc). Whether it should or not, having a couple of those big names on there can be the difference on millions of dollars of funding. It might not be important at many levels of the industry, but it's useful to have if you're a founder or early employee in startups.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: