Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can be a "brogrammer" and be outraged at this all the same, you know… Your association of brogrammer == sexist is just as offensive and discriminatory as the attitude you accuse all brogrammers to have towards women.


I thought that sexist was part of the definition of the "brogrammer" term. It's at least exclusionary.


I am outraged at this.

No company should have to suffer employees doing stupid things like this.

If she wants to sue over his behavior, why not sue him?

Oh right, who has the most money?


If the company allowed the discrimination and harassment to occur even after several complaints, why shouldn't they be held liable?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: