Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’d like to see a lot more nuance.

> For example, would it be “unreasonably discriminatory” to create a 5G fast lane that includes the most popular apps in a category since it responds to consumer preferences?

What’s in it for the ISP if they can’t collect money for it?

> There’s lots of ways for ISPs to use slices for things that are not normal internet service such as a dedicated slice for a farming operation using remote controlled tractors, slices for telemetry data and oversight of autonomous cars, or providing a slice for a stadium’s video system at a crowded game.

Really? Will the ISP allow anyone to get such a slice under fair, reasonable, and non discriminatory terms? Or will this just favor companies with a cozy relationship with an ISP? Just because these industries aren’t direct-to-consumer doesn’t mean the same issues don’t exist?



I have another proposal. I think ISPs should provide the same QoS options to everyone. With guaranteed speeds and also data caps and all. At least this option would make things more transparent.

AFAIK, most of the backbone and rural networks were subsidized with public funds to provide broadband internet. I find it disturbing that some private companies are trying to secure high QoS for themselves without paying for the infrastructure itself. It's like crony capitalism where losses are socialized while profits are privatized.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: