Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Outside of privacy, I could imagine it might be beneficial to structure a set of companies as a primary company and a bunch of shell companies to separate accounting and legal matters. This way if a sub-company is in a dangerous industry or has large liabilities in its normal business that you would want the primary company to be insulated from that. IANAL so I don't know if this is a use case, there are probably ways to do this w/o privacy.


As an example, it’s extremely common for financial companies of all sorts to create a company to hold an asset or group of assets. This can be done for all manner of reasons, including difference in beneficial ownership.

A VC fund, PE fund, etc will often have a “manager” (the possibly big-name company that operates it) and a bunch of limited partners for that specific fund. If you own a piece of a BlackRock fund, for example, you don’t own BlackRock itself. And the corporate structure reflects this.


This is exactly why we’ve been unable to hold anyone responsible for misuse of their powers in so many instances.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: