Does anybody know why Bulma has a large number of gambling companies sponsoring it? If you look at the sponsor list you will see a huge portion is gambling related. Does it offer something that that industry finds particularly valuable?
It is also some illegal casinos which target the Swedish market "utan spelpaus" means that it is a casino which ignores the Swedish anti-addiction self block. And "utan svensk licens" means that they do not have a Swedish gambling licence.
Which, funnily enough, is expanded on in no less than three[1][2][3] dedicated websites that are essentially called "Casino-Without-Swedish-License" in various ways, and are also linked as sponsors on the bulma.io website.
I did not realize this until now, thanks for pointing it out. I will have to find an alternative because explaining to clients that I use software that openly and prolifically “sells out” to casinos isn’t something I want to spend my time doing
Daft question, but if you hadn't realised, then your client's obviously asked that question yet (and might not)?
Open source needs to find a way to make money and backlinks is a reasonable way of doing it. I should say for my own open source project I refuse backlinks to gambling sites on morality grounds though - although looking at how much revenue it might bring in on a monthly basis, there is a lot of temptation there.
Sure, if you have the privilege to make your life unnecessarily harder than it is, then choosing another CSS framework based on whether it has shady sponsors or not is a great pastime.
I was gonna make a jokey comment, but I’m seriously at a loss for words. This is the most overtorqued ridiculous take I’ve read all week. Who cares who else is using the free libraries that you’re using?
