Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hm. Well I agree that humans probably arrive at 1+1 by induction first, but quickly progress to the application of formal logic. Reasoning is essential to human development.

Take a 3-year-old who's holding two pieces of candy. Say, "I'm going to take these and give you two pieces back." Then give him one piece back. He's going to start crying. Perhaps he can't explain why, exactly. But if you ask him why it's not fair, he's going to tell you that two is more than one. Ask why is two more than one: It doesn't require succession. It's a fact of the reality we inhabit. We can measure it with our hands, our eyes, its weight. We can hear two sounds, two voices at once and differentiate them (non-blocking, nonlinear processing). AIs don't inhabit any reality grounded in the physical constraints they purport to understand, therefore they can never arrive at the conclusion that 2 > 1. They just appear to "know" it because it's part of the data set.

But once you understand that 2 > 1, then 3 must be > 2. If acquisition is hardwired into our brains, then so is the capacity for logically explaining why Y > X.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: