> Of the 421 violent posts identified from September 2011 to September 2022
421 posts over a period of 11 years. That's less than one a week. From a subreddit with (at present) 1.1 million subscribers. Whoop-die-fucking-doo. Hacker News has more violent posts than that.
It's pretty clear from the very first sentence that this piece is hugely judgemental and coloured. This is not a scientific publication, it's a blog post, and not a very good blog post to boot. This seems part of some bigger pissing match and a scientific publication is being narcissist abused because "believe the science!" or some such.
I have no real knowledge or like or dislike of /r/NoFap or anyone else here, but this does not seem like a serious study or analysis or anything else.
yes, it is an interesting topic, but the article reads more like a hit piece than curious and open minded scientific investigation.
Similarly, it strikes me as odd that the author repeatedly struggles to wrap their head around the idea that a forum of > 1 million people holds heterogeneous and even conflicting opinions.
It also implausabily glosses over the idea that there could be a real and sizable contingent of people with unhealthy personal relationships with sex or pornography
Why is the shame unhealthy? How could we even say, without knowing why an individual is ashamed? Maybe they should be. Some shame is appropriate (eg Trump ought to feel ashamed about many things, though he doesn’t seem to)
> Scientists regularly comment on the misleading use of their research by NoFap to monetize (Mascherek et al. Citation2021) and on NoFap’s non-evidence-based practice (Shahinyan et al. Citation2023). NoFap has responded with dozens of legal intimidation letters or lawsuits to scientists, media, and scientific organizations (e.g., Plummer Citation2020) and attempted to prohibit scientists from collecting data concerning NoFap (Gałuszka Citation2020; Prause and Binnie Citation2023).
The feeling is mutual, apparently. Weird how this movement demonizing masturbation is seen as "demonized" by a study documenting violent outcomes from the movement. Is the tradition of shaming men's sexual desires so sacred that we should overlook its violent extremes?
By appearances, they've done considerable research to back up their claims. Do you have evidence that they're being dishonest, or are you just smearing them?