Hmm, is population decline inevitable? With sufficiently large time scale. If it is, would it be better for species to exist longer time or peak at larger numbers. Or maybe some per specime x time total?
I would argue peaking hard and crashing hard by overshooting is worse than peaking slower and then steady very long decline.
I would argue peaking hard and crashing hard by overshooting is worse than peaking slower and then steady very long decline.