Sure, as long as I can close over a yield object. There is no reason for filter ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gpderetta on July 18, 2023 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Coroutines for Go Sure, as long as I can close over a yield object. There is no reason for filter and map to know that the last function parameter takes a continuation.

uhura on July 18, 2023 [–]

But then, how could you guarantee type safety?

This yield is not an object, it is handling the execution context to another stack.

gpderetta on July 18, 2023 | [–]

It is a delimited one-shot continuation. Delimited continuations are first class objects like any other and it should be possible to close over them.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact