Good points. Especially about our discussion here. I guess I would narrow it and say as long as it’s not a commentary on the article itself then no worries! If someone is commenting on the article without reading then I still feel like I would rather them read it first so we can have the same definitions.
> If someone is commenting on the article without reading
Yeah, I hear you. I note in my case, I read the article and posted about the clarifying sentence.
I did find it funny that so many people were in an animated discussion about the interpretation of the headline.
gremlinsinc: "how does it know there isn't one further out past the observable universe?"
doctoboggan: "the title is a little unclear, but I read it as the most distant known supermassive black hole"
dotnet00: "I feel like contextually it's pretty obvious "
Obviously without reading the first sentence of the article.
