Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The factors for assessing the news score are broken or misplaced.

For example this piece of news gets less than 5:

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-may-run-short-cash-aft...

Yet it’s certainly important, affecting a large number of people, and matching other criteria.

As someone who works in media I agree with the premise this comes from, but the implementation is a typical examples of the complexities and nuances that LLMs do not get. Also you’re just under the illusion to escape an agenda, but you’re just swapping human agendas for a technobabble view of journalism that is arid as it can possibly get.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: