Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> > The interpreter uses very dubious implementation decisions, and the language that is created as a side-effect makes reasoning about anything near impossible.

That is in my opinion just completely unconstructive hate that I would not take serious as criticism. It doesn't give any concrete things that could be improved and instead just gives some vague statement about the whole site being generally bad.



Good thing the rest of the document is dedicated to pointing out all the specific things wrong with it, then?


The things it points out seem rather small and nitpicky. Doesn't really support the negative summary of the article.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: