And this is an example of why the people creating ChatGPT will end up holding the bag. When you read a document produced by ChatGPT, no matter if you prompted it or someone else did, ChatGPT is providing you information. That information can be complete bollocks. If those lies portray a person or group in a bad way, that is defamation in most jurisdictions, because your opinion of that person or group has been negatively affected, falsely. No matter if you choose to republish the information or not. The only fig leaf the creators of these systems has to hide behind is a disclaimer, and they won't hold up in many courts of law.