Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I disagree. If there is a procedure for getting ChatGPT to play chess accurately and you discard that and do some naive approach as a way of disproving the article, doesn't sound to me like you have disproven anything.

I dont understand the point of your second sentence, seems to be entirely missing the substance of the conversation.



The gymnastics you GPT True Believers go through to make this stuff "work" are really something else.

By the way - definitely read the article. But once again - I thought the methodology was bad, and thus the conclusion was bad.


I don’t think this is any crazy level of gymnastics.

But not going to keep replying, you engage online in a way that will turn lots of people you talk to away.


I'll admit to having mistook your reply with another (hence the non-sequitur second half of my comment.) Apologies for my brusque tone.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: