The whole point appears to be that there IS a one size fits all set of design patterns once you've got the right "bounded contexts" and the right "ubiquitous language".
It doesn't have anything interesting to say about either one of those things though. The whole idea appears to be a set up for a bunch of design patterns.
There is definitely a part of the DDD community that wants to do it that way. I call it “domain driven design driven design”. But the big names in DDD have all explicitly said that’s wrong.
It doesn't have anything interesting to say about either one of those things though. The whole idea appears to be a set up for a bunch of design patterns.