Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"In fact if you go back in time and look at some of the first versions of Python it's a very, very ugly language and it does not come as a surprise that not too many people took notice of Python in the early days."

I don't know... Python in the early 90s looked pretty much the same as it does now. Unless you mean that some features (or lack of them) required inelegant workarounds?

I think most machines were just not powerful enough yet in the 90s to make Python a viable solution for many problems. As computers got faster, that became less of an issue. Also, there was already a scripting language with a large following back then (Perl, naturally). Whether it was "ugly" probably had little to do with it. (Quite the contrary in fact, I recall that Python was often perceived as clean, elegant, concise and very readable.)



No GC, coupled with Guido's ignorant comments about how superior refcounts were.

Wacky three namespace scoping.

Back in those days, Python seemed cleaner than it was.


In a way that's still true. I'm thinking of `nonlocal` and attribute lookup which is all too complicated.


And the GIL, in a world of multi-core processors with each capable of several threads... a single process is meh.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: