A relevant quote from the linked article:

> I implore you, dear reader, to set aside your petty grievances; trifling things such as the format of an article or website, the unfortunate repetition of a name, or the vexing loss of information when pressing the back button. They are so common and so lacking in originality that they have no interest whatsoever.

But for real, the styling is just copied from the original: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

That's so good I'm tempted to replace the existing rule with it.

I find it incredible that this was written by an AI and it translated:

> back-button breakage

into

> the vexing loss of information when pressing the back button

It's a remarkably good translation.

Then again "the unfortunate repetition of a name" does not have quite the same meaning as "name collisions".

> Then again "the unfortunate repetition of a name" does not have quite the same meaning as "name collisions".

I noticed that too. I wonder what a more precise wording would be.

Homonyms. The unfortunate reuse of a name for an unrelated thing.

Should

> "They are so common"

be

"These are so common"

?

It has the same look as the HN guidelines.

Reader mode seems to work on the HN guidelines page, but not on this page, although the markup appears to be the same. Not sure what's up with that.