Isn't the big question, how did someone convince the Court(s) that the software couldn't possibly be wrong and therefore the case is proved beyond a reasonable doubt?
This sounds like a failure on so-many levels. The defence should easily have thrown this out.
Presumably if Fujitsu sent their own witness to say the software was not broken, they committed perjury since it sounds like a fair number of people knew about bugs.
This sounds like a failure on so-many levels. The defence should easily have thrown this out.
Presumably if Fujitsu sent their own witness to say the software was not broken, they committed perjury since it sounds like a fair number of people knew about bugs.