i sorta think this is dumb. these are all true, but superficial. this piece doesn't touch on any real, deeper reasons that well-intentioned code is unmaintainable, like excessive and unnecessary state & implementation inheritance.
Enumerating some of the ways to screw things up may be helpful in that it allows a reasonably intelligent reader to intuit the underlying connections and apply that intuition to a broader set of coding circumstances.
sure, i agree. i just think things like weak names, hungarian notation, brace preferences and lispy one-liners have no objective impact on the complexity of a system.
