1. Wrong. There are cases where reproducible builds are valuable. There are other times when you don’t care. This allows you to choose for what fits your situation.
2. Okay, what about projects that don’t fit your criteria? This is useful and requested.
You seem to have a different philosophy than other people but seem to be unable to consider those other philosophies. It’s your way or the highway.
Not everyone wants an exciting language. Some people want a stable and useful language. Go is intentionally not exciting. They add features based on user feedback and real world use, at a slow and careful pace.
Also consider you might get downvotes not because it’s about go, but because you’re kinda rude. You just spouted negativity with no explanation and called tons of people Sons of Bitches. Could be that?
2. Okay, what about projects that don’t fit your criteria? This is useful and requested.
You seem to have a different philosophy than other people but seem to be unable to consider those other philosophies. It’s your way or the highway.
Not everyone wants an exciting language. Some people want a stable and useful language. Go is intentionally not exciting. They add features based on user feedback and real world use, at a slow and careful pace.
Also consider you might get downvotes not because it’s about go, but because you’re kinda rude. You just spouted negativity with no explanation and called tons of people Sons of Bitches. Could be that?