This seems like a useful enough tool, but, good God, could they have picked a worse name? It doesn't rank for "typedef" on the first page of Google, and, while it does rank for "typedefs", it's in the middle of a bunch of stuff that is mostly explaining how typedefs work in C or C++.
It's reasonably easy to pick the thing that's related to computing if Google only shows a page of stuff that is obviously not programming-related. But, this is most likely going to get lost among the other computing-related items.
People who name products really need to think about this - microsoft is the worst offender in this regard. Naming something which begins with a "." is stupid in the first place, but then you choose a word which could not be any more generic on the internet, and _then_ you create multiple versions of it with different variations. Even worse is these patterns are repeated across several products (e.g. xbox, visual studio code)
It's reasonably easy to pick the thing that's related to computing if Google only shows a page of stuff that is obviously not programming-related. But, this is most likely going to get lost among the other computing-related items.