The point is there is no evidence of a crime. There is no reason for the public to dig into this person’s life with such fervor.

Probably not, but the election of the same name as the boy that was assassinated is unfortunate at least.

that's a scary comment. I'll remind you that he's innocent until someone proves otherwise.

Thats a presumption in pursuit of justice, not a principle to follow. Humans are generally all guilty of something, even if they dont get caught