Why does somebody saying "I wouldn't use this." have to provide an alternative? If such a statement is backed by reasons I find it interesting to read. They're saving me trouble trying it out, just like any other review.
"So you can either complain that they're not good, or you can try and improve them."
Yes, that sentence is literally correct. But it sounds like it's saying one option is not useful. And I still haven't heard a single reason why reviews of benchmarks are bad.
Responding to a criticism with "those who can't do criticize" is super, super boring. It's been done to death. You're just tarring all criticism with an overly broad brush. If it's bad criticism why is it worth responding to? And if it's plausible criticism why aren't you focusing on the actual details?
