When one studies renewable energy, inevitably one will come across people who think that Tesla's (or someone more obscure's) greatest invention had been 'suppressed' by monied interests that don't want us to have nice things. Of course, it's invariably the same story, it might have worked but wasn't profitable to build.

It's peculiar how similar a sentiment the pro-nuclear crowd expresses. I wonder whether there's an overlap in patterns of thought between the communities.