No, I understood them. Despite my commentnot being directly about the 10k/day part of the issue, my reply is directly relevant to the parent comments. Perhaps you misunderstood my first comment?
TylerE was only talking about the 10k/day boundary. Why did you reply to TylerE if you wanted to talk about something else? You should have replied to someone else. As-is, the thread just became really confusing.
> “Why did you reply to TylerE if you wanted to talk about something else?”
Because my comment was related to that. Not all related things had to be squarely about the 10k/day item. My reply, which was very related to the parent comments, just wasn’t about the 10k/day part.
It’s not necessary for a reply to focus on or discuss precisely the 10k/day item in order to be related and merit being a reply in this subthread.
