Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think simplístic means what you think it does.

Go isn't simplistic. It might be seen as simple but it isn't so simple that it loses utility. There's plenty of nuance and elegance in there to solve real problems.

A simplistic version of go would have a bunch of wizards and a giant code generator that runs after you click Next enough times.



> A simplistic version of go would have a bunch of wizards and a giant code generator that runs after you click Next enough times.

You mean like Go and how people compensate for lack of generics? Generating code?

That kind of simplistic?


> You mean like Go and how people compensate for lack of generics? Generating code?

Not to mention how mocks for unit tests are generated. Golang is a step back from Java and .NET




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: