I’m OP. Thank you for the feedback!
I don't see why not comparing "SRS over no repetition at all". To me, SRS or no SRS, they are all learning/studying methods.
All SRS algorithm is expanding, i.e. increasing intervals. So maybe with continue success, it'll be: 1 day, 2, 4, 16, 40, 300 (arbitrary numbers).
How do you propose to lean medical texts, if without SRS?
Mnemonic techniques only work with rote recall, whereas flashcards, if formulated well, can help induction, understanding, not just recall.
The idea with SRS is that the exponential scheduling is supposed to be more efficient than random or sequential scheduling.
I did study for medical exams with mnemonic techniques. Studies have shown that they do not inhibit understanding at all. In my experience they even help understanding. They totally dominate SRS on anything looking like a table or list. With text it's not as pronounced, but still you can memorize the key words, as few as possible, as many as necessary.
Flashcards are first of all a rewrite of the original material. If that is really necessary, the original material sucks, at least for the purposes of the exam. The physical cards are marginally easier to use than a textbook, but then again, writing them takes a lot of time and effort.
Usually when people talk about SRS, they mean flashcards or Software. At the very least you would need to keep track of the learning schedule and what you forget. Which I found impractical for learning large amounts of stuff.
All SRS algorithm is expanding, i.e. increasing intervals. So maybe with continue success, it'll be: 1 day, 2, 4, 16, 40, 300 (arbitrary numbers).
How do you propose to lean medical texts, if without SRS?
Mnemonic techniques only work with rote recall, whereas flashcards, if formulated well, can help induction, understanding, not just recall.