If you mean "blockchain technology" to mean cryptographic ledgers than yes.
If you mean blockchain technology as defined by the original bitcoin paper, then why? What use does the system gain by allowing anyone to participate anonymously (e.g. money).
Blockchains solve specific problems. Cryptographic ledgers, like we already use for things like CAs, are the better choice almost always. Certainly they could be made more like blockchains in their openness, transparency, and participation. But going full blockchain isn't required.
However some people have been using "blockchain technology" to include the ideas of cryptographic ledgers, so I want to be clear.
Certificate Transparency implements similar aspects to what be considered a "blockchain" (to money hungry VC people), and it's a similar use case to being a notary.
If you mean blockchain technology as defined by the original bitcoin paper, then why? What use does the system gain by allowing anyone to participate anonymously (e.g. money).
Blockchains solve specific problems. Cryptographic ledgers, like we already use for things like CAs, are the better choice almost always. Certainly they could be made more like blockchains in their openness, transparency, and participation. But going full blockchain isn't required.
However some people have been using "blockchain technology" to include the ideas of cryptographic ledgers, so I want to be clear.