Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
This is why we have Stuxnet (metzdowd.com)
27 points by rendx on March 21, 2016 | hide | past | favorite | 4 comments


I'm hoping/wishing that Peter will name and shame.

The installation process he just described was acceptable in the late 1990s but things have moved on since then.


> The installation process he just described was acceptable in the late 1990s but things have moved on since then.

Not in the industrial space they haven't. Plant managers don't understand or care about anything other than keeping their lines operating.


The issue is that it needs to be explained in terms that they can understand: ... or part of your line will fail, randomly, and may take over a day to repair, IF your maintenance procedures are current, if not, you'll lose 4-5 days of line time.

Note: not one mention of "security", or good neighbor, or infection, only cutting to the point.


For sure. When software runs and operates as expected, then the mindset is, "Don't touch it". No one cares that the JRE is old and vulnerable or that it's running telnet with the user name and password both set to 'admin'. Updating is considered more dangerous than the risk of compromise.

I heard a security researcher once say that her greatest fear for SCADA/control systems was compromise by kids/teenagers who had no idea what they had access to and began goofing around on the system. She said that they could accidentally cause more damage than organized attackers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: