Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zvqcMMV6Zcr's commentslogin

> That's an uncommon experience.

The very first thing that Tesla was criticised for was terrible QA process. The quality was random and there were huge differences between factories. So I can totally believe there are plenty of Tesla made cars that made their owners happy. Of course few people can afford such gamble.


Do you think non-recourse mortgage (the dominant type in USA) also should be banned? VC finds a bank that borrows them money to buy X, with X as collateral. It is exactly the same. The mass selloff of assets and absurd cost-cutting is caused by new owners not giving a damn about the future of acquired company, its workers nor clients - it has nothing to do with leveraged buyout itself.

Please tell me this is some kind of satire because people checking on agents makes as much sense as people waking up early only to checking progress on Gentoo rebuilding itself from sources. Which definitely happened but as a niche not something common enough to observe.

Server grade hardware (rack blades) is already poor fit for consumer needs and AI dedicated hardware straight up requires external liquid cooling systems. It will be expensive to adopt them.

Strip it for usable parts (DRAM/VRAM/NANAD chips, maybe also some of the controllers), then recover any valuable metals (copper heat sinks, gold on contact pins), simple as that. :)

This is a bit silly. Are there any ads that people do trust?


While I understand the sentiment, most ads for a long time were fairly reputable? Like in the news papers, most ads were to make you aware of a brand (next car I buy I'll feel safe buying X because I've seen it in the papers), or to notify you about a local store having a sale etc. And disabling my ad blocker and going to a page I see ads for house listings nearby, offers to buy sports gear in a store in my city, and ads for a well known telecom company. All things I would trust.

What I don't understand is why high-value brands sell their screen estate to straight up scams or low quality ads.


I dunno, I’ve been doing some genealogy research and looking at a lot of newspapers from the 1800’s. It’s striking to me how much they are essentially Facebook. Sure, on the front page there’s the news of the day, but on the inside are jokes, riddles, local notes on who visited who and where. And the ads. Literal snake oil! As well as all sorts of other sketchy tonics for curing any sort of “ill constitution”.

I think those of us on this forum likely grew up in a golden age of ads being relatively harmless, but I’m not sure that’s the normal state.


It's not the "state of nature", but there's obviously been a lot of litigation and regulation in the meantime. Look up the charmingly named Carbolic Smoke Ball case, for example.


Ads for products I already use. Probably 90% of the stuff in your house has been advertised somewhere. A good number of the books on my shelves advertise other books by the same author in the back (some of these are order forms, many are not), and I certainly do use them to see what's the next book in a series of what reviewers have had to say about other books by the author. Heck, some of the objects I own and use daily (hopefully lower than average) is itself advertising, such as the branded Crayola desk lamp I'm using.


Yes, of course. These exist because they work. If no one fell for these scams, they wouldn’t continue to exist.


I see an ad for a product I bought and it makes me worried I got scammed. The usual offender is Peak Design.


Exactly. Why did the article author think ads weren't scams before they were "AI" generated?


Where does the author claim or even remotely suggest that?


They only NOW assume all ads are scams. Suggests they didn't make that assumption before, doesn't it?


And in your mind NOW always means "since GenAI is a thing"?

Most of the time, when people realize something, it happens NOW. Also, AI isn't even mentioned in the headline at all, and not even in the first part of the article. It's just used as one hint that it might be scam, then followed up with further evidence.


In the headline - the word Now implies "Ads before weren't scams but they are now"


And where in the headline is "AI"?


"Here are three ads that are scammy; the first two were clearly generated by AI, and the third may have been created by AI."


The "AI" evangelists are trying to explain to us that all ads are to be trusted because they're "AI" generated now...


Headline - aka. 4th paragraph of the article.

I mean I remember when Penny Arcade Ram ads for games and such and they only ran the ads if the approved of the game. The ads were worth clicking into. They sold a real product for a cost approximating its value.

Now ads are just scams


> Are there any ads that people do trust?

What? Yes, of course. Are you so terminally online that you assume all advertising is the fake AI chum that we see on the web?


Even online I get a lot of ads for goods/services I do use, or could see myself using.


HN users are mostly 1980s levels of institutional and media trust. Not sure why.


> Delivery Methods screen

The one that recently kept "accidentally" switching pick-up points? I sure hope it was not caused by Lynx, just shitty business requirements.


At least in past I gave up and just used N++ with Wine. It didn't fit the rest of system at all, but was more usable for editing simple text files than DE defaults of GEdit and Kate.


NASA doesn't have enough radioactive material for its current needs, RTG is used only for missions far from Sun (and Earth).


I think it counts as necromancy. After all it brings frozen hamsters back to life.


Amazon's Mechanical Turk exists since 2005, so we are 20 years in the future


MechanicalTurk is for desk jobs and for tasks that originate as ideas in a human mind -- even if they get routed via an API.

Here we are talking about AI agents coming up with a set of tasks as part of their thinking/reasoning step ..and when some of those tasks are real world physical tasks, assign them to a willing human being.

Those tasks wont necessarily be desk jobs or knowledge work.

It could be say -- go chop a tree, or go wave a protest banner, or go flip the open/close sign on my shopfront, or go and preach crustafarianism.


Mechanical Turk was for humans to rent a human, which is not a new idea


mTurk has an API (and I guess it had it since the beginning). It is, of course, very AWS-que, but LLMs should be able to use it just fine.

∗ ∗ ∗

> which is not a new idea

I don’t think “[x] but for agents” counts as a new idea for every [x]. I’d say it’s just one new idea, at most.


I mean, the entire name of Mechanical Turk plays on "packaging up humans as technology", given the original Mechanical Turk was a "machine" where the human inside did the work.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: