Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zendist's commentslogin

Weird.


The main benefit for me to just know and primarily use mermaid is that it integrates with markdown in Azure DevOps and GitHub seamlessly. No need for a text to image build step or similar.


Same reason. I can add to this list Readme.com and Notion.


There are many overlaps with SolidJS. How is this project different, ignoring the obvious; that you don't support JSX.


I've tried to address the technical difference (as far as I understand Solid) at the top of this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43940144


This reminds me a bit of MSFTs Kusto language. Such an immensely useful way to slice and dice large amounts of structured data.


This is false. GDPR is not ignored, I can tell you that much.


Another checking in from the my company was and continues to be effected by GDPR.


If you were to build a library like `rill` in the Go-way, what would your Batch API usage look like?


How in the world did they come up with the obfuscated code for this? Surely they must be using a tool?


no, it was a thing back in the 90's (and likely earlier.) The goal was to write a program that was "impossible to read". Some of the winners are seriously creative. And it's very much just smat kids and their machines...

I remember one back in the day which wasn't obfuscated at all. It was clearly a simple utility. Except that it didn't do what you thought it did, it did something completely different. (alas I can't remember the details...)


> I remember one back in the day which wasn't obfuscated at all.

Perhaps it was the Underhanded C Contest[1][2]? It's another competition, entires there often seem simple and perform something unexpected.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underhanded_C_Contest

[2]: https://www.underhanded-c.org


There are a number of blog posts online and StackOverflow questions explaining IOCCC entries, and they generally seem to be built/obfuscated by hand. It's an art and it's far from trivial, which is one of the reasons why the contest exists :)

For an example, see this StackOverflow question and its detailed answers for an overview of what obfuscation techniques can be used, although many more exist of course: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15393441/obfuscated-c-co...

I was able to compile it on macOS, but had to include an extra flag to stop clang from being too strict (version 16):

    cc -Wno-implicit-function-declaration -std=c89 -o test test.c
    ./test


That's definitely a thing. Additionally, humans are surprisingly friendly in all the wrong ways when it comes to physical security (tailgating, "forgotten ID/credentials", etc.).


A compromised human is immensely more feasible than a physical break in, but almost all posts above fixate on the latter


Sorry to anyone having this, that sounds awful.

Would we easily know if the inverse phenomenon is happening in the rest of us? We're seeing people "better looking" than "they are"?


Can’t help but think of the 2002 Ted Chiang novelette “Liking What You See” and its tech “Calliagnosia,” a medical procedure that eliminates a person’s ability to perceive beauty. Excellent read (as are almost all his stories, imho).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liking_What_You_See:_A_Documen...


Don't know about that - but we're incredibly sensitive to some minor changes to faces;

I saw a clip not too long ago of a face digitally transitioning between male and female, the changes themselves were incredibly subtle, and yet the result was obvious and undeniable.

There's also the uncanny valley, faces that are almost human yet very slightly off, and somehow come across as incredibly creepy.


I believe the medical term for that is "drunk". A condition I've had the misfortune to suffer from myself on occasion.


Experiments have shown that we perceive our own face as more attractive than it really is. When presented with a series of morphed pictures of their own face, from less attractive to more attractive, people tend to not pick the unmodified picture as the real one, but one morphed slightly more towards attractive (where “attractive” mostly means “symmetric”, IIRC).


Sounds interesting, but I hope the study was done both with photos and photos flipped liked in the mirror.


Some do, after sobering up.


That’s what the those crazies say, the reptilians amongst us glamour all humans into seeing them as better looking humans.


Same as https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/30/24209650/openai-chatgpt-a... ? I don't have Twitter, so I'm not 100p sure.


Full tweet:

"We’re starting to roll out advanced Voice Mode to a small group of ChatGPT Plus users. Advanced Voice Mode offers more natural, real-time conversations, allows you to interrupt anytime, and senses and responds to your emotions.

Users in this alpha will receive an email with instructions and a message in their mobile app. We'll continue to add more people on a rolling basis and plan for everyone on Plus to have access in the fall. As previously mentioned, video and screen sharing capabilities will launch at a later date.

Since we first demoed advanced Voice Mode, we’ve been working to reinforce the safety and quality of voice conversations as we prepare to bring this frontier technology to millions of people.

We tested GPT-4o's voice capabilities with 100+ external red teamers across 45 languages. To protect people's privacy, we've trained the model to only speak in the four preset voices, and we built systems to block outputs that differ from those voices. We've also implemented guardrails to block requests for violent or copyrighted content.

Learnings from this alpha will help us make the Advanced Voice experience safer and more enjoyable for everyone. We plan to share a detailed report on GPT-4o’s capabilities, limitations, and safety evaluations in early August."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: